 |
 |
MarBEF Data System |
 |
|
|
|
WoRMS taxon details
original description
Müller, J.; Troschel, F. H. (1840). Über die Gattungen der Ophiuren. <em>Archiv für Naturgeschichte.</em> 6(1): 326-330., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7203204#page/335/mode/1up [details]
taxonomy source
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. (1981). Corrigenda. <em>Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature.</em> 38(4): 317., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/12227872
page(s): 317; note: Decision that Ophioderma is neuter. [details]
taxonomy source
Stöhr, S.; Weber, A. A.-T.; Boissin, E.; Chenuil, A. (2020). Resolving the Ophioderma longicauda (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) cryptic species complex: five sisters, three of them new – Corrigendum. <em>European Journal of Taxonomy.</em> (607)., available online at https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.607
note: Correction of gender of Ophioderma [details]
taxonomy source
Melville, R. V. (1980). Opinion 1152. Ophiura Lamarck, 1801 and Ophioderma Müller & Troschel, 1840 (Ophiuroidea): ruling on application of these names. <em>Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature.</em> 37(2): 78-80.
note: Erroneously made Ophioderma feminine. [details]
taxonomy source
Stöhr, S.; Boissin, E.; Chenuil, A. (2009). Potential cryptic speciation in Mediterranean populations of Ophioderma (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). <em>Zootaxa.</em> 2071: 1-20. [details]
context source (PeRMS)
Solís-Marín, F. A.; Alvarado, J. J.; Abreu-Pérez, M.; Aguilera, O.; Alió, J.; Bacallado-Aránega, J. J.; Barraza, E.; Benavides-Serrato, M.; Benítez-Villalobos, F.; Betancourt-Fernández, L.; Borges, M.; Brandt, M.; Brogger, M. I.; Borrero-Pérez, G. H.; Buitrón-Sánchez, E.; Campos, L. S.; Cantera, J.; Clemente, S.; Cohen-Renjifo, M.; Coppard, S.; Costa-Lotufo, L. V.; del Valle-García, R.; Díaz, Y.; Díaz de Vivar, M. E.; Díaz-Martínez, J. P.; Durán-González, A.; Epherra, L.; Escolar, M.; Francisco, V.; Freire, C. A.; García-Arrarás, E.; Gil, D. G.; Guarderas, P.; Hadel, V. F.; Hearn, A.; Hernández, J. C.; Hernández-Delgado, E. A.; Herrera-Moreno, A.; Herrero-Pérezrul, M. D.; Hooker, Y.; Honey-Escandón, M. B. I.; Lodeiros, C.; Luzuriaga, M.; Manso, C. L. C.; Martín, A.; Martinez, M. I.; Martínez, S.; Moro-Abad; Mutschke, E.; Navarro, J. C.; Neira, R.; Noriega, N.; Palleiro-Nayar, J. S.; Pérez, A. F.; Pérez-Ruzafa, A.; Prieto-Rios, E.; Reyes, J.; Rodríguez, R.; Rubilar, T.; Sancho-Mejía, T.; Sangil, C.; Silva, J. R. M. C.; Sonnenholzner, J. I.; Ventura, C. R.; Tablado, A.; Tavares, Y.; Tiago, C. G.; Tuya, F.;Williams, S. M. (2013). Appendix. <em>In: J. J. Alvarado & F. A. Solís-Marín (eds), Echinoderm Research and Diversity in Latin America.</em> pp. 471-510. Springer; Berlin & Heidelberg. page(s): 543-654. [details]
basis of record
Hansson, H.G. (2001). Echinodermata, <B><I>in</I></B>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). <i>European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels,</i>. 50: pp. 336-351. (look up in IMIS) [details]
additional source
Ljungman, A. (1867). Ophiuroidea viventia huc usque cognita enumerat. <em>Öfversigt af Kgl. Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar 1866.</em> 23(9): 303-336., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/32287761 [details]
additional source
Koehler, R. (1914). A contribution to the study of Ophiurans of the United States National Museum. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 84: 1-173, available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7907416
page(s): 3-8; note: Used Ophioderma as feminine and changed all names accordingly [details]
additional source
Müller, J. and Troschel, F. H. (1842). System der Asteriden.1. Asteriae. 2. Ophiuridae. <em>Vieweg: Braunschweig.</em> xxx+134 pp. 12 pls., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/44159
note: Presented longicauda as feminine, thereby confusing the true gender of Ophioderma [details] 
additional source
Lütken, C. F. (1859). Additamenta ad historiam Ophiuridarum. Anden Afdelning. <em>Det kongelige danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter. 5 Raekke, Naturvidenskabelig og mathematisk Afdelning.</em> 5, 177-271, 5 pl., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/13591530
page(s): 187-200; note: Considered Ophioderma to be feminine [details]
additional source
Ziesenhenne, F.C. 1955. A review of the genus Ophioderma M. & T. Essays in the natural sciences in honour of Captain Alan Hancock, 185-201.
note: Considered Ophioderma to be neuter [details]
 Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Nomenclature The gender of this genus has long been confused. Early authors treated it as neuter or feminine (e.g. Tommasi 1970), , without consensus. It was ruled to be of feminine gender by the ICZN (opinion 1152; 1980), but shortly after they issued a corrigendum, finally settling on neuter gender (IZCN 1981). [details]Unreviewed
Habitat Known from seamounts and knolls [details]
From editor or global species database
Unreviewed
|
|
|
|
|
