|
|
MarBEF Data System |
|
|
|
|
WoRMS taxon details
original description
Grube, A. E. (1877). Anneliden - Ausbeute S.M.S. Gazelle. <em>Monatsbericht der Koniglich Preussischer Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin.</em> 509-554., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/35723826 page(s): 512-513; note: There is a long description in Latin followed by some meristic information in German [details]
context source (Deepsea)
Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) of UNESCO. The Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS), available online at http://www.iobis.org/ [details]
basis of record
Bellan, G. (2001). Polychaeta, <i>in</i>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. <em>Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 214-231. (look up in IMIS) [details]
additional source
Dauvin, J.-C.; Dewarumez, J.-M.; Gentil, F. (2003). Liste actualisée des espèces d'Annélides Polychètes présentes en Manche [An up to date list of polychaetous annelids from the English Channel]. <em>Cahiers de Biologie Marine.</em> 44(1): 67-95., available online at http://www.sb-roscoff.fr/sites/www.sb-roscoff.fr/files/documents/station-biologique-roscoff-dauvinal2003-3835.pdf [details] Available for editors [request]
additional source
Imajima, Minoru. (2003). Polychaetous Annelids from Sagami Bay and Sagami Sea collected by the Emperor Showa of Japan and deposited at the Showa Memorial Institute, National Science Museum, Tokyo (II). Orders included within the Phyllodocida, Amphinomida, Spintherida and Eunicida. <em>National Science Museum Monographs.</em> 23: 1-221., available online at https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110004708004 page(s): 30-33 [details] Available for editors [request]
additional source
McIntosh, W.C. [M'Intosh]. (1885). Report on the Annelida Polychaeta collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-1876. <em>Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Zoology.</em> 12 (part 34): i-xxxvi, 1-554, pl. 1-55, 1A-39A, & Annelida stations map., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/50688426 page(s): 39-44, Pl. IVA figs. 1-8 [details]
additional source
Hutchings, Patricia A.; McRae, Jane. (1993). The Aphroditidae (Polychaeta) from Australia, together with a redescription of the Aphroditidae collected during the Siboga Expedition. <em>Records of the Australian Museum.</em> 45(3): 279-363., available online at https://doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1975.45.1993.24 page(s): 333-336; note: description of additional material from southeastern Australia and Heard Island [details] Available for editors [request]
additional source
Wu, Xuwen.; Hutchings, Pat; Murray, Anna; Xu, Kuidong. (2021). Laetmonice iocasica sp. nov., a new polychaete species (Annelida: Aphroditidae) from seamounts in the tropical Western Pacific, with remarks on L. producta Grube, 1877. <em>Journal of Oceanology and Limnology.</em> Efirst: 1-12., available online at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00343-021-0413-6 page(s): 2, table 2; note: discussion of variability in Laetmonice producta from Kerguelen Island and Antarctica with south-eastern Australia and Japan [details] Available for editors [request]
identification resource
Day, J.H. 1963. Polychaete Fauna of South Africa: Part 7. Species from depths between 1,000 and 3,330 meters west of Cape Town. Annals of the South African Museum, 46(14): 353-371., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/40867181 page(s): 356; note: includes a key to Laetmonice benthaliana, L. filicornis, Laetmonice producta and L. wyvillei [details]
Unknown type, geounit Kerguelen Islands [details]
From editor or global species database
Publication date Grube's Gazelle polychaetes report was at least read August 1877 as that date heads the first page. If the volume was only published complete, and not in parts, then 1878 would be the date, although it is impossible to know now if preprints were circulated in 1877. A year date of 1877 seems safest to use. [details]
|
|
|
|
|