 |
 |
MarBEF Data System |
 |
|
|
|
WoRMS taxon details
original description
(of Microspio armata Thulin, 1957) Thulin, G. (1957). Über einige Spioniden (Polychaeta) aus dem Öresund. <em>Kungliga Fysiografiska sällskapets i Lund Förhandlingar.</em> 27(5): 49-59. (look up in IMIS) [details] Available for editors  [request]
context source (Deepsea)
Census of Marine Life (2012). SYNDEEP: Towards a first global synthesis of biodiversity, biogeography and ecosystem function in the deep sea. Unpublished data (datasetID: 38), available online at http://www.comlsecretariat.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/SYNDEEP-Towards-a-first-global-synthesis-of-biodiversity-biogeography-and-ecosystem-function-in-the-deep-sea-Eva-Ramirez-Llodra-et-al..pdf [details]
additional source
Dewarumez, Jean-Marie (look up in IMIS) [details]
additional source
Bellan, G. (2001). Polychaeta, <i>in</i>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. <em>Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 214-231. (look up in IMIS) [details]
redescription
Jirkov, I.A. (2001). [Polychaeta of the Arctic Ocean] (In Russian) Polikhety severnogo Ledovitogo Okeana. Yanus-K Press, Moscow, 632 pp., available online at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259865957_Jirkov_2001_Polychaeta_of_the_North_Polar_Basin [details] Available for editors [request]
redescription
Bick, Andreas; Otte, Katrin ; Meissner, Karin. 2010. A contribution to the taxonomy of Spio (Spionidae, Polychaeta, Annelida) occurring in the North and Baltic Seas, with a key to species recorded in this area. Marine Biodiversity 40(3): 161-180.
page(s): 162 [details]
status source
Maciolek, Nancy J. 1990. A redescription of some species belonging to the genus <i>Spio</i> and <i>Microspio</i> (Polychaeta: Annelida) and descriptions of three new species from Northwestern Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Natural History, 24: 1109-1141., available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/00222939000770701
page(s): 1128; note: comments on inadequate type material for determination [details]
From editor or global species database
Editor's comment As known records are from the shallows in the Baltic Sea, a deepsea presence seems unlikely. Inclusion as a deepsea species needs verification. Possibly this inclusion was an interpretation from records in Jirkov 2001:319 [details]
Taxonomic remark Both Maciolek (1990) and Bick et al. (2010) have commented on the poor type material (mid fragments only), but Bick et al believe the species is readily distinct based on chaetae compared to other related Baltic spionids. Morphology still incompletely known (pygidium not known). [details]
|
|
|
|
|
Present 
