MarBEF Data System



Kinorhyncha name details

Habroderella ferox Zelinka, 1928

731500  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:731500)

 unaccepted (juvenile stage)
Species
marine
Zelinka, K. (1928). Monographie der Echinodera. <em>Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.</em> 1-396, plates I-XXVII. [details] Available for editors  PDF available
Holotype  uncatalogued, geounit Gulf of Trieste  
Holotype uncatalogued, geounit Gulf of Trieste [details]
Etymology [The species name was derived from Latin ferox, ferocious, courageous. It is not clear what this referred to, possibly to...  
Etymology [The species name was derived from Latin ferox, ferocious, courageous. It is not clear what this referred to, possibly to the contrast between the transparent cuticle and the long strong spines, both characters emphasized by Zelinka.] [details]

Taxonomic remark Zelinka (1928) erected the genus Habroderella for eyeless species described from juvenile stages of Echinoderes. The single...  
Taxonomic remark Zelinka (1928) erected the genus Habroderella for eyeless species described from juvenile stages of Echinoderes. The single specimen of Habroderella ferox available to Zelinka represented the last juvenile stage with a female inside. Zelinka (1928, pp. 257-258) was confused that the sternal plates were visible from trunk segments 2(!)-8. He addressed this to a still incomplete development of the sternal plates in the posterior segments and a forward movement of the anterior segments so the first pair of sternal plates appeared in segment 2 instead of segment 3 which would have been expected for species of Echinoderes.
Alternatively, the specimen might have been a representative of the genus Fissuroderes Neuhaus & Blasche, 2006. Amazingly, H. ferox revealed a middorsal spine on segments 4-9, whereas no described species of Fissuroderes possesses a middorsal spine on segment 9. However, the postembryonic development of species of Fissuroderes is unknown, and the spine on segment 9 may be lost during moulting to the adult stage. [details]
Neuhaus, B. (2021). World Kinorhyncha Database. Habroderella ferox Zelinka, 1928. Accessed at: http://www.marinespecies.org/kinorhyncha/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=731500 on 2024-11-25
Date
action
by
2013-06-03 07:49:47Z
created
2020-09-16 06:26:28Z
changed

original description Zelinka, K. (1928). Monographie der Echinodera. <em>Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.</em> 1-396, plates I-XXVII. [details] Available for editors  PDF available

additional source Neuhaus, B. (2013). 5. Kinorhyncha (= Echinodera). In: Schmidt-Rhaesa, A. (Ed.), Handbook of Zoology, Gastrotricha, Cycloneuralia and Gnathifera, Volume 1: Nematomorpha, Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, Loricifera. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin,. pp. 181-348. (look up in IMIS), available online at https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272536.181 [details] Available for editors  PDF available
 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

Holotype uncatalogued, geounit Gulf of Trieste [details]
From editor or global species database
Etymology [The species name was derived from Latin ferox, ferocious, courageous. It is not clear what this referred to, possibly to the contrast between the transparent cuticle and the long strong spines, both characters emphasized by Zelinka.] [details]

Taxonomic remark Zelinka (1928) erected the genus Habroderella for eyeless species described from juvenile stages of Echinoderes. The single specimen of Habroderella ferox available to Zelinka represented the last juvenile stage with a female inside. Zelinka (1928, pp. 257-258) was confused that the sternal plates were visible from trunk segments 2(!)-8. He addressed this to a still incomplete development of the sternal plates in the posterior segments and a forward movement of the anterior segments so the first pair of sternal plates appeared in segment 2 instead of segment 3 which would have been expected for species of Echinoderes.
Alternatively, the specimen might have been a representative of the genus Fissuroderes Neuhaus & Blasche, 2006. Amazingly, H. ferox revealed a middorsal spine on segments 4-9, whereas no described species of Fissuroderes possesses a middorsal spine on segment 9. However, the postembryonic development of species of Fissuroderes is unknown, and the spine on segment 9 may be lost during moulting to the adult stage. [details]
Web site hosted and maintained by Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ) - Contact