 |
 |
MarBEF Data System |
 |
|
|
|
WoRMS name details
original description
Uschakov, Pavel Vladimirovich [as Ushakow]. (1933). Eine Neue Form aus der Familie Sabellidae (Polychaeta). <em>Zoologischer Anzeiger.</em> 104(7/8): 205-208.
note: as subfamily in Sabellidae, for Lamellisabella, with subfamily name spelled "Lamellisabellidae" [details]
additional source
van der Land, J.; Southward, E. (2001). Pogonophora, <B><I>in</I></B>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). <i>European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels,</i> 50: pp. 235 (look up in IMIS) [details]
source of synonymy
Rouse, G.W. (2001). A cladistic analysis of Siboglinidae Caullery, 1914 (Polychaeta, Annelida): formerly the phyla Pogonophora and Vestimentifera. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 132: 55-80. (look up in IMIS) [details]
 Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Classification as subfamily in Sabellidae, for Lamellisabella, with subfamily name spelled "Lamellisabellidae" (should have been Lamellisabellinae). Quote p.208: "Die Abwesenheit eines Inversum setarum, der eigenartige Schwanzanhang, die hufeisenförmigen Gebilde und Plättchen anstatt der Borsten verleihen unserer Form einen ausgearteten, aberranten Charakter und weisen ihr eine gesonderte Stellung im System an, so daß ich für dieselbe eine neue Unterfamilie Lamellisabellidae nov. subfam. - Lamellisabella n. g. zachsi n. sp. aufzustellen vorschlage" [The absence of an inverse setarum, the peculiar tail attachment, the horseshoe-shaped formations and platelets instead of the bristles give our form a degenerate, aberrant character and assign it a separate position in the system, so that I have a new subfamily to propose - Lamellisabellidae nov. subfam. - Lamellisabella n. g. zachsi n. sp."
It is significant that Hartman (1951: 379) supported the linking of Lamellisabella Uschakov to Sabellidae, although Johansson (1937) had by then proposed to create (phylum) Pogonophora for the genus, and for some time Pogonophora were missclassified outside of Annelida, and had high-level ranks to subdivide different morphologies before being returned to within Annelida, demoted in rank to Siboglinidae. [details]
|
|
|
|
|
