|
|
MarBEF Data System |
|
|
|
|
WoRMS taxon details
original description
(of Triloculina lecalvezae Kaasschieter, 1961 †) Kaasschieter, J. (1961). Foraminifera of the Eocene of Belgium. <em>Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Mémoires.</em> 147: 1-271., available online at http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/252007.pdf page(s): p. 166 [details]
original description
(of Triloculina laevigata d'Orbigny in Terquem, 1878 †) Terquem, O. (1878). Les Foraminifères et les Entomostracés Ostracodes du Pliocene Supérieur de l'île de Rhodes. <em>Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France.</em> (3)1: 1-84., available online at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/42313398 page(s): pp. 57-58 pl. 5 fig. 20-21 [details]
taxonomy source
Poignant, A. (2019). The "avatars" of Triloculina laevigata Orbigny, 1826, generic and specific attribution. <em>Carnets de géologie (Notebooks on geology).</em> 19(3): 35-46., available online at https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/69756 [details]
context source (WoRCS)
Romano, E.; Bergamin, L.; Di Bella, L.; Frezza, V.; Marassich, A.; Pierfranceschi, G.; Provenzani, C. (2020). Benthic foraminifera as proxies of marine influence in the Orosei marine caves, Sardinia, Italy. <em>Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.</em> 30: 701–716., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3288 [details]
From editor or global species database
Taxonomic remark D'Orbigny (1826) quoted Triloculina laevigata from the Mediterranean sea but in his unpublished drawings he figured a fossil species (Eocene-Paris). T. laevigata when made available by Terquem (1878) was an homonym of T. laevigata Bornemann, 1855. For those reasons Kaasschieter (1961) renamed T. laevigata into T. lecalvezae (dedicated to Yolande Le Calvez explaining the feminin genitive) referring to the Eocene species from Belgium. Yolande Le Calvez (1970) while publishing about the foraminifera from the Paleogene of Paris Basin made it clear that T. lecalvezae should be used for the fossil species d'Orbigny referred to and that T. laevigata (Recent) should be renamed and restudied what was done by Cimerman and Langer (1991): T. laevigata is now accepted as Pseudotriloculina laevigata but the recent species should be formaly described and probably renamed.
T. laevigata was also chosen as the type species of Pseudotriloculina Cherif, 1970 (see Loeblich and Tappan (1987) for the choice of the lectotype) and further taxonomic explanations. Poignant (2019) considers Pseudotriloculina Cherif, 1970 to be a taxon inquirendum and the species Affinetrina alcidi to be the species of d'Orbigny (1826) based on his unpublished drawings (later published in Schlumberger (1893), Fornasini (1905). Poignant's study does not show notworthy differences between fossil and Recent specimens. [details]
From editor or global species database
|
|
|
|
|