MarBEF Data System



WoRMS name details

Suberites carnosus f. incrustans Topsent, 1900

134517  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:134517)

 unaccepted (preoccupied)
Forma
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Topsent, E. (1900). Étude monographique des Spongiaires de France. III.Monaxonida (Hadromerina). <em>Archives de Zoologie expérimentale et générale.</em> (3) 8: 1-331, pls I-VIII. [details]  OpenAccess publication 
Type locality contained in North Sea  
type locality contained in North Sea [details]
Homonymy The form was described by Topsent predominantly from the Pas-de-Calais region (W coast of France) and from Banyuls...  
Homonymy The form was described by Topsent predominantly from the Pas-de-Calais region (W coast of France) and from Banyuls (Mediterranean coast of France). The original text of Topsent (1900) would indicate that he considered the S. c. incrustans (as well as the other mentioned S. carnosus forms) as infrasubspecific, i.e. growth forms or morphotypes of a species, rather than proper (sub)specific taxa. But his assignment to a variety in 1925 and followed by a forma designation by Cabioch and Vacelet indicated it was subsequently considered a distinct taxon. No clear type material was indicated by Topsent. The description reminds strongly of Protosuberites denhartogi Van Soest & De Kluijver (2003: 403, fig. 1 = Prosuberites epiphytum sensu Topsent 1900: 236, not Lamarck 1814) described from the Oosterschelde, the Netherlands, 54.64°N 3.91°E, depth 0–1 m (holotype ZMA Por. 04403). Topsent (1900: 236) also pointed this out (as P. epiphytum), but refuted conspecificity by alleging that the tylostyles of the two species were different, without explaining the difference. A further species with similarity to the present form is Protosuberites stephensae Van Soest & Hooper, 2020: 35, a new name for the preoccupied P. incrustans (sensu Stephens 1915 as Laxosuberites). The combination Suberites carnosus incrustans is a junior primary homonym of Suberites incrustans Hansen, 1885 (currently Protosuberites incrustans), and as a junior homonym it needed to be renamed. Van Soest proposed as stated above to assign the present forma to the synonymy of Protosuberites denhartogi Van Soest & De Kluijver, 2003, thus removing the homonymy. [details]
de Voogd, N.J.; Alvarez, B.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Cárdenas, P.; Díaz, M.-C.; Dohrmann, M.; Downey, R.; Goodwin, C.; Hajdu, E.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Kelly, M.; Klautau, M.; Lim, S.C.; Manconi, R.; Morrow, C.; Pinheiro, U.; Pisera, A.B.; Ríos, P.; Rützler, K.; Schönberg, C.; Turner, T.; Vacelet, J.; van Soest, R.W.M.; Xavier, J. (2024). World Porifera Database. Suberites carnosus f. incrustans Topsent, 1900. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=134517 on 2024-05-26
Date
action
by
2004-12-21 15:54:05Z
created
2014-12-18 16:26:28Z
changed
2019-05-30 09:42:28Z
changed
2024-01-28 11:21:31Z
changed

Creative Commons License The webpage text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License


original description Topsent, E. (1900). Étude monographique des Spongiaires de France. III.Monaxonida (Hadromerina). <em>Archives de Zoologie expérimentale et générale.</em> (3) 8: 1-331, pls I-VIII. [details]  OpenAccess publication 

basis of record Van Soest, R.W.M. (2001). Porifera, <b><i>in</i></b>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). <i>European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification</i>. <em>Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 85-103. (look up in IMIS[details]  OpenAccess publication 

basis of record Van Soest, R.W.M. (2024). Correcting sponge names: nomenclatural update of lower taxa level Porifera. <em>Zootaxa.</em> 5398(1): 1-122., available online at https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5398.1.1
page(s): 86 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

additional source Cabioch, L. (1968). Contribution à la connaissance de la faune des Spongiaires de la Manche occidentale. Démosponges de la région de Roscoff. <em>Cahiers de Biologie Marine.</em> 9(2): 211-246.
page(s): 216 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

additional source Topsent, E. (1925). Etude des Spongiaires du Golfe de Naples. <em>Archives de Zoologie expérimentale et générale.</em> 63(5): 623-725, pl. VIII.
page(s): 633 [details]  OpenAccess publication 

additional source Bibiloni, M-A. (1981). Estudi faunistic del litoral de Blanes (Girona). II Sistemàtica d'esponges. <em>Butlletí de la Institució Catalana d'Història Natural.</em> 47: 5-59.
page(s): 16-17 & 45 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

additional source Vacelet, J. (1976). Inventaire des Spongiaires du Parc national de Port-Cros (Var). <em>Travaux scientifiques du Parc national de Port-Cros.</em> 2, 167-186.
page(s): 174 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 

additional source Naveiro Millán, A. (2002). Poríferos de la costa da Arrábida (Portugal). Clase Demospongiae. <em>Tesina Unversidad de Santiago de Compostela.</em> 165 pp.
page(s): 44-45 Figura 13 [details]  Available for editors  PDF available [request] 
 
 Present  Present in aphia/obis/gbif/idigbio   Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

From editor or global species database
Homonymy The form was described by Topsent predominantly from the Pas-de-Calais region (W coast of France) and from Banyuls (Mediterranean coast of France). The original text of Topsent (1900) would indicate that he considered the S. c. incrustans (as well as the other mentioned S. carnosus forms) as infrasubspecific, i.e. growth forms or morphotypes of a species, rather than proper (sub)specific taxa. But his assignment to a variety in 1925 and followed by a forma designation by Cabioch and Vacelet indicated it was subsequently considered a distinct taxon. No clear type material was indicated by Topsent. The description reminds strongly of Protosuberites denhartogi Van Soest & De Kluijver (2003: 403, fig. 1 = Prosuberites epiphytum sensu Topsent 1900: 236, not Lamarck 1814) described from the Oosterschelde, the Netherlands, 54.64°N 3.91°E, depth 0–1 m (holotype ZMA Por. 04403). Topsent (1900: 236) also pointed this out (as P. epiphytum), but refuted conspecificity by alleging that the tylostyles of the two species were different, without explaining the difference. A further species with similarity to the present form is Protosuberites stephensae Van Soest & Hooper, 2020: 35, a new name for the preoccupied P. incrustans (sensu Stephens 1915 as Laxosuberites). The combination Suberites carnosus incrustans is a junior primary homonym of Suberites incrustans Hansen, 1885 (currently Protosuberites incrustans), and as a junior homonym it needed to be renamed. Van Soest proposed as stated above to assign the present forma to the synonymy of Protosuberites denhartogi Van Soest & De Kluijver, 2003, thus removing the homonymy. [details]
    Definitions

Loading...
Web site hosted and maintained by Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ) - Contact