 |
 |
MarBEF Data System |
 |
|
|
|
Deep-Sea taxon details
additional source
Robba, E. (2013). Tertiary and Quaternary fossil pyramidelloidean gastropods of Indonesia. <em>Scripta Geologica.</em> 144: 1-191. [April 2013]. [details] Available for editors 
additional source
Høisæter, T. (2014). The Pyramidellidae (Gastropoda, Heterobranchia) of Norway and adjacent waters. A taxonomic review. <em>Fauna Norvegica.</em> 34: 7-78., available online at https://doi.org/10.5324/fn.v34i0.1672
page(s): 33-35 [details] Available for editors
additional source
Giannuzzi-Savelli, R.; Pusateri, F.; Micali, P.; Nofroni, I.; Bartolini, S. (2014). <i>Atlante delle conchiglie marine del Mediterraneo Vol. 5 (Heterobranchia)</i>. Palermo, Edizioni Danaus. pp. 1-111, with 41 unnumbered plates (figs. 1-363), appendix pp. 1-91.
page(s): 56-58, appendix p. 13-14, 61-62 [details]
additional source
Schander, C.; Halanych, K. M.; Dahlgren, T.; Sundberg, P. (2003). Test of the monophyly of Odostomiinae and Turbonilliinae (Gastropoda, Heterobranchia, Pyramidellidae) based on 16S mtDNA sequences. <em>Zoologica Scripta.</em> 32(3): 243-254., available online at https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-6409.2003.00112.x [details]
 Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Over fifty species worldwide have been placed in (sub)genus Megastomia Monterosato, 1884 by a number of authors (e.g. Saurin, 1959, 1962; Peñas & Rolán, 1999; Giannuzzi-Savelli et al. (2014). On the basis of 16s mtDNA sequence data, Schander et al. (2003) distinguished, and placed in Megastomia, two species (M. conoidea (Brocchi, 1814) and M. corimbensis (Schander, 1994)), which clustered separately from other species placed in Odostomia Fleming, 1813. However Høisæter (2014: 34) correctly pointed out that the type species Odostomia conspicua Alder, 1850 "is a typical Odostomia s.s. and has few traits in common with O. conoidea".
Considering the large number of species involved, and considering that for most of these species Odostomia is probably not more appropriate, the published combinations with Megastomia are nevertheless retained herein as "accepted" until more data become available. [details]
|
|
|
|
|
