 |
 |
MarBEF Data System |
 |
|
|
|
WoRMS taxon details
Nomenclatureoriginal description
Sars, G.O. (1909). Copepoda Harpacticoida. Parts XXVII & XXVIII. Cletodidae (concluded), Anchorabolidae, Cylindropsyllidae, Tachidiidae (part). An Account of the Crustacea of Norway, with short descriptions and figures of all the species. Bergen Museum, Bergen. 5:305-336, pls. 209-224. (look up in IMIS) [details] 
basis of record
Huys, R. (2001). Copepoda - Harpacticoida. In: Costello, M.J. et al. (eds.) European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels. 50:268-280. (look up in IMIS) [details] Available for editors [request]
TaxonomyOtheradditional source
Sars, G.O. (1909). Copepoda Harpacticoida. Parts XXVII & XXVIII. Cletodidae (concluded), Anchorabolidae, Cylindropsyllidae, Tachidiidae (part). An Account of the Crustacea of Norway, with short descriptions and figures of all the species. Bergen Museum, Bergen. 5:305-336, pls. 209-224. (look up in IMIS) page(s): 323 [details] 
additional source
Bodin, P. (1997). Catalogue of the new marine Harpacticoid Copepods. Studiedocumenten van het K.B.I.N. = Documents de Travail de l'I.R.Sc.N.B., 89. Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen: Brussels, Belgium. 89: 1-304. (look up in IMIS) page(s): 323 [details] Available for editors [request]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Taxonomy Page 98.
section 102. Sars (1909b: 323) established the genus Stenocaris to accommodate a new species S. gracilis Sars, 1909b and further remarked on the striking similarity with the species described by T. Scott (1892) as Cylindropsyllus minor. From the original diagnosis it is not clear whether Sars meant to include C. minor and, if so, which species he designated as the type. In a later paper redescribing S. minor (T. Scott, 1892), Sars (1911c: 434) reiterated the close relationship between both species by stating that Scott's species “... is evidently referable to the genus Stenocaris, ...., agreeing with the type species, S. gracilis, in all essential characters”. Since C. minor was doubtfully included it does not qualify as an originally included species (ICZN Art. 67.2.5) and, consequently, Sars’s (1911c) statement cannot be regarded as a formal subsequent designation. Sars’s (1909b) type fixation of S. gracilis was by monotypy, rendering Apostolov and Marinov's (1988: 278) fixation of S. minor as the type species invalid. The family-group name Stenocaridae proposed by Monard (1927: 171) is a junior subjective synonym of Cylindropsyllidae Sars, 1909b.
[details]
From editor or global species database
|
|
|
|
 |