 |
 |
MarBEF Data System |
 |
|
|
|
WoRMS taxon details
Nomenclatureoriginal description
Blainville, H. M. D de [Henri-Marie Ducrotay]. (1828). Mollusques, Vers et Zoophytes [entries in VEA-VERS, volume 57]. In: Dictionnaire des Sciences naturelles, dans lequel on traite méthodiquement des différens êtres de la nature, considérés soit en eux-memês, d'après l'état actuel de nos connoissances, soit relativement à l'utilité qu'en peuvent retirer la médicine, l'agriculture, le commerce et les arts. Suive d'une biographie des plus célèbres naturalistes. vol. 57 [Tome LVII. Vea - Vers] F.G. Levrault, Strasbourg & Paris., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/25316522
page(s): 468 [details]
original description
(of Castalia Savigny, 1822) Savigny, Jules-César. (1822). Système des annélides, principalement de celles des côtes de l'Égypte et de la Syrie, offrant les caractères tant distinctifs que naturels des Ordres, Familles et Genres, avec la Description des Espèces. Description de l'Égypte ou Recueil des Observations et des Recherches qui ont été faites en Égypte pendant l'Expédition de l'Armée Française, publié par les Ordres de sa Majesté l'Empereur Napoléon le Grand, Histoire Naturelle, Paris. 1(3):1–128., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/41329897
page(s): 45-46 [details] 
original description
(of Neopodarke Hartman, 1965) Hartman, O. (1965). Deep-water benthic polychaetous annelids off New England to Bermuda and other North Atlantic areas. Occasional Papers of the Allan Hancock Foundation. 28: 1-384., available online at http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/cdm/ref/collection/p15799coll82/id/20299
page(s): 68 [details]
original description
(of Halimede Rathke, 1843) Rathke, H. (1843). Beiträge zur Fauna Norwegens. [Contributions to the Fauna of Norway]. Nova Acta Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae Naturae Curiosorum, Breslau & Bonn. 20: 1-264., available online at https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.11613
page(s): 166-168 [details]
TaxonomyOtheradditional source
Fauchald, K. (1977). The polychaete worms, definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County: Los Angeles, CA (USA), Science Series. 28:1-188., available online at http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/123110.pdf [details]
additional source
Bellan, G. (2001). Polychaeta, in: Costello, M.J. et al. (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels. 50: 214-231. (look up in IMIS) [details]
additional source
Pleijel, Fredrik. (1998). Phylogeny and classification of Hesionidae (Polychaeta). Zoologica Scripta. 27(2): 89-163, 38 figures, 7 tables., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.1998.tb00433.x [details] Available for editors  [request]
 Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Type designation The complex timeline of taxonomic and nomenclatural activity for Nereimyra, Nereis rosea, and related taxa is examined in Pleijel, Rouse & Nygren, (2012: 39). Blainville (1828:468) took Myriana longissima Savigny, 1822 and Castalia rosea (Fabricius, 1780) and placed them in his new genus Nereimyra. He doesn't spell out the new combinations and usages are hard to find, but of necessity we must assume they were created as combinations and can be said to exist from that time (there are no usages reported in BHL). It is important to know that only these two names can be candidates for the type species of Nereimyra. Next Ørsted (1843) placed Nereis rosea in synonymy with Nereis punctata Müller, 1776 and referred Nereis punctata to Castalia Savigny. However, Castalia Savigny is a junior homonym and cannot be used further. Støp-Bowitz (1948: 61) noted that Castalia was preoccupied by Castalia Lamarck, 1819 (Mollusca), and that the oldest available name is Nereimyra. He maintained the synonymy of Nereis rosea to Nereimyra punctata, but does not claim Nereimyra punctata as a new combination (which it presumably is in his work). The Hartman catalogue (1959: 189) has Nereis punctata as type species for Nereimyra. She oddly lists four Nereis original names following her list of nine Nereimyra combinations, and thus records Nereis punctata twice, once as a Nereimyra combination. Nereis rosea is referred to Nereimyra punctata. Pleijel, Rouse & Nygren (2012: 42) correctly report that Hartman has thus indirectly designated Nereis rosea as type species of Nereimyra. It was Hartman's practice to record senior synonyms as the type species rather than the actual type species. Code article 69.2.2 addresses this practice by allowing this indirect (perhaps accidental) fixing of a genus type species. [details]
|
|
|
|
|
