Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning
EU Network of Excellence

 
Main Menu

· Home
· Contacts
· Data Systems
· Documents
· FAQ
· Links
· MarBEF Open Archive
· Network Description
· Outreach
· Photo Gallery
· Quality Assurance
· Register of Resources
· Research Projects
· Rules and Guidelines
· Training
· Wiki
· Worldconference

 

Register of Resources (RoR)

 People  |  Datasets  |  Literature  |  Institutes  |  Projects 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

The structure of upper level pelagic food webs in the antarctic. Effect of phytoplankton distribution
Ainley, D.G.; Fraser, W.R.; Smith Jr., W.O.; Hopkins, T.L.; Torres, J.J. (1991). The structure of upper level pelagic food webs in the antarctic. Effect of phytoplankton distribution. J. Mar. Syst. 2(1-2): 111-122. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0924-7963(91)90017-O
In: Journal of Marine Systems. Elsevier: Tokyo; Oxford; New York; Amsterdam. ISSN 0924-7963; e-ISSN 1879-1573
Also appears in:
Nihoul, J.C.J.; Djenidi, S. (1991). Ice covered seas and ice edges: Physical, chemical and biological processes and interactions - Proceedings of the 22th International Liège Colloquium on Ocean Hydrodynamics. Journal of Marine Systems, 2. Elsevier Science Publishers: Amsterdam. 520 pp., more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keyword
    Marine/Coastal

Authors  Top 
  • Ainley, D.G.
  • Fraser, W.R.
  • Smith Jr., W.O.
  • Hopkins, T.L.
  • Torres, J.J.

Abstract
    We investigated diet composition and diversity and the diet overlap between species within the seabird community of the Scotia-Weddell Confluence region, Antarctica, during spring, autumn and winter. Seasonal changes in diet characteristics and overlap among species were viewed in the context of changes in prey availability as a function of vertical distribution in the water column. The latter was in turn affected by where phytoplankton and associated grazers were located. When primary productivity was confined to the pack ice during winter, thus bringing grazers and their predators closer to the surface, micronekton were much more vulnerable to avian predators and the latter were able to select prey on the basis of energetic value. As a consequence the upper food web was much less diffuse than during the other seasons when prey occurred throughout the upper portion of the water column and predators had to be opportunistic. The mobility of micronekton and nekton bring some structure to the upper portion of marine food webs, thereby introducing seasonal variability of trophic relationships within Antarctic food webs.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors 


If any information here appears to be incorrect, please contact us
Back to Register of Resources
 
Quick links

MarBEF WIKI

Erasmus Mundus Master of Science in Marine Biodiversity and Conservation (EMBC)
Outreach

Science
Responsive Mode Programme (RMP) - Marie Nordstrom, copyright Aspden Rebecca

WoRMS
part of WoRMS logo

ERMS 2.0
Epinephelus marginatus Picture: JG Harmelin

EurOBIS

Geographic System

Datasets

 


Web site hosted and maintained by Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ) - Contact data-at-marbef.org