 |
 |
MarBEF Data System |
 |
|
|
|
Deep-Sea taxon details
original description
Darboux, G. (1899). Recherches sur les Aphroditiens. <em>Travaux de l'Institut de Zoologie de l'Université de Montpellier et de la Station zoologique de Cette.</em> Ser. 2, mem. 6: 1-276. [details]
taxonomy source
Darboux, J. Gaston. (1900). Recherches sur les Aphroditiens. <em>Bulletin Scientifique de la France et de la Belgique.</em> 33: 1-274., available online at http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/10710932
note: Appears to be a second reprint publication of the work first published in the Montpellier memoire series, which is not yet available online. [details]
additional source
Fauchald, K. (1977). The polychaete worms, definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. <em>Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County: Los Angeles, CA (USA), Science Series.</em> 28:1-188., available online at http://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/123110.pdf [details]
additional source
Bellan, G. (2001). Polychaeta, <i>in</i>: Costello, M.J. <i>et al.</i> (Ed.) (2001). European register of marine species: a check-list of the marine species in Europe and a bibliography of guides to their identification. <em>Collection Patrimoines Naturels.</em> 50: 214-231. (look up in IMIS)
note: checklist listing [details]
redescription
Pettibone, Marian H. (1970). Revision of the genus Euthalenessa Darboux (Polychaeta: Sigalionidae). <em>Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology.</em> 52: 1-30., available online at http://si-pddr.si.edu/dspace/handle/10088/6313
note: revision of genus [details]
 Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
From editor or global species database
Publication date First published 1899 in the Montpellier memoire series. The reprint in Bulletin Scientifique de la France et de la Belgique. 33 was evidently published the following year [details]
Type designation Pettibone (1970) designated Thalenessa digitata Mclntosh, 1885, as type species of Euthalenessa. At first examination this is an action of uncertain validity as Darboux did not name any species in his genus. He creates a name, Euthalenessa for McIntosh's concept of Baird's Thalenessa, and he calls the new genus name a 'nomen mutatum', which is not a concept allowed in zoological nomenclature. If we simply treat Euthalenessa as a proposed new genus the situation is clearer. McIntosh mentions three species from the Challenger Expedition under the genus Thalenessa, Baird, char, emend.: T. digitata, T. fimbriata, and T. oculata. Under ICZN article 12.2.5 for names published prior to 1931 the bibliographic reference in Darboux to McIntosh's Thalenessa of 1885 is sufficient to indicate these three species were intended to be included in Euthalenessa of Darboux, although Darboux never included the names in his own work. [details]
|
|
|
|
|
