Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning
EU Network of Excellence

 
Main Menu

· Home
· Contacts
· Data Systems
· Documents
· FAQ
· Links
· MarBEF Open Archive
· Network Description
· Outreach
· Photo Gallery
· Quality Assurance
· Register of Resources
· Research Projects
· Rules and Guidelines
· Training
· Wiki
· Worldconference

 

Register of Resources (RoR)

 People  |  Datasets  |  Literature  |  Institutes  |  Projects 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page

Review of the effects of protection in marine protected areas: current knowledge and gaps
Ojeda-Martínez, C.; Bayle-Sempere, J.T.; Sánchez Jerez, P.; Salas, F.; Stobart, B.; Goñi, R.; Falcón, J.M.; Graziano, M.; Guala, I.; Higgins, R.; Vandeperre, F.; Le Diréach, L.; Martín-Sosa, P.; Vaselli, S. (2011). Review of the effects of protection in marine protected areas: current knowledge and gaps. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 34(1): 191-203
In: Animal Biodiversity and Conservation. Museu de Zoologia de Barcelona: Barcelona. ISSN 1578-665X; e-ISSN 2014-928X
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keyword
    Marine/Coastal
Author keywords
    Marine conservation; Management; Assessment; Descriptors; Subject of study; Marine protected areas

Authors  Top 
  • Ojeda-Martínez, C.
  • Bayle-Sempere, J.T.
  • Sánchez Jerez, P.
  • Salas, F.
  • Stobart, B.
  • Goñi, R.
  • Falcón, J.M.
  • Graziano, M.
  • Guala, I.
  • Higgins, R.
  • Vandeperre, F.
  • Le Diréach, L.
  • Martín-Sosa, P.
  • Vaselli, S., more

Abstract
    The effectiveness of marine protected areas (MPAs) and the conservation of marine environments must be based on reliable information on the quality of the marine environment that can be obtained in a reasonable timeframe. We reviewed studies that evaluated all aspects related to the effectiveness of MPAs in order to describe how the studies were conducted and to detect fields in which research is lacking. Existing parameters used to evaluate the effectiveness of MPAs are summarised. Two–hundred and twenty–two publications were reviewed. We identified the most commonly used study subjects and methodological approaches. Most of the studies concentrated on biological parameters. Peer reviewed studies were based on control vs. impact design. BACI and mBACI designs were used in very few studies. Through this review, we have identified gaps in the objectives assigned to MPAs and the way in which they have been evaluated. We suggest some guidelines aimed at improving the assessment of the effects of protection in MPAs.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors 


If any information here appears to be incorrect, please contact us
Back to Register of Resources
 
Quick links

MarBEF WIKI

Erasmus Mundus Master of Science in Marine Biodiversity and Conservation (EMBC)
Outreach

Science
Responsive Mode Programme (RMP) - Marie Nordstrom, copyright Aspden Rebecca

WoRMS
part of WoRMS logo

ERMS 2.0
Epinephelus marginatus Picture: JG Harmelin

EurOBIS

Geographic System

Datasets

 


Web site hosted and maintained by Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ) - Contact data-at-marbef.org