Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning
EU Network of Excellence

 
Main Menu

· Home
· Contacts
· Data Systems
· Documents
· FAQ
· Links
· MarBEF Open Archive
· Network Description
· Outreach
· Photo Gallery
· Quality Assurance
· Register of Resources
· Research Projects
· Rules and Guidelines
· Training
· Wiki
· Worldconference

 

Register of Resources (RoR)

 People  |  Datasets  |  Literature  |  Institutes  |  Projects 

[ report an error in this record ]basket (1): add | show Print this page

one publication added to basket [108028]
Do nematode mucus secretions affect bacterial growth?
Moens, T.; Paiva dos Santos, G.A.; Thompson, F.L.; Swings, J.; Fonséca-Genevois, V.; Vincx, M.; De Mesel, I.G. (2005). Do nematode mucus secretions affect bacterial growth? Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 40(1): 77-83. dx.doi.org/10.3354/ame040077
In: Aquatic Microbial Ecology. Inter-Research: Oldendorf/Luhe. ISSN 0948-3055; e-ISSN 1616-1564
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keywords
    Microorganisms > Bacteria
    Population functions > Growth
    Secretion
    Secretory products > Body fluids > Mucus
    Bacteria [WoRMS]; Nematoda [WoRMS]
Author keywords
    nematodes; bacteria; nematode mucus; microbial community composition; facilitation; microbial food webs

Authors  Top 
  • Moens, T., more
  • Paiva dos Santos, G.A.
  • Thompson, F.L.
  • Swings, J.
  • Fonséca-Genevois, V.
  • Vincx, M., more
  • De Mesel, I.G., more

Abstract
    Many aquatic nematodes secrete mucus while moving, and prominent microbial growth on nematode mucus tracks has been observed. This has been interpreted as a mutualistic interaction in which nematodes may feed on the micro-organisms that colonise their tracks (i.e. the mucus-trap hypothesis). Because of recent evidence that nematodes can affect bacterial community composition, we tested whether bacterial communities growing on nematode mucus differ from extant communities. We characterised the bacterial epigrowth of tracks produced on agar by 2 estuarine nematode species (the facultative predator Adoncholaimus fuscus and the bacterivore Geomonhystera disjuncta) and compared it to that of artificial tracks and to the bacterial inocula. The experiment lasted 8 d, with bacterial community analyses (using fatty acid methyl ester [FAME] analysis) after 2, 4, 6 and 8 d. Although our experimental design promoted a low-diversity bacterial community, multidimensional scaling generally separated communities on nematode tracks from inocula, artificial track communities typically being intermediate and highly variable. In a total of 6 bacterial inocula spotted with A. fuscus, only 1 bacterial strain was recorded on nematode tracks, compared to 6 on artificial tracks and 7 in the inocula. In addition, colony morphology of this particular bacteria, Pseudoalteromonas tetraodonis, was less diverse on nematode tracks than on artificial tracks or inocula. Treatments with G. disjuncta yielded similar yet less consistent and less pronounced results. Our results suggest that nematode mucus may affect colonisation and succession patterns of bacteria. This may have important implications for food-web interactions and ecosystem functions involving both bacteria and nematodes.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors 


If any information here appears to be incorrect, please contact us
Back to Register of Resources
 
Quick links

MarBEF WIKI

Erasmus Mundus Master of Science in Marine Biodiversity and Conservation (EMBC)
Outreach

Science
Responsive Mode Programme (RMP) - Marie Nordstrom, copyright Aspden Rebecca

WoRMS
part of WoRMS logo

ERMS 2.0
Epinephelus marginatus Picture: JG Harmelin

EurOBIS

Geographic System

Datasets

 


Web site hosted and maintained by Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ) - Contact data-at-marbef.org